 |
| |
| |
THE INVESTIGATION ON THE EFFECT OF STOMACH SECRETION
During the tests on white rats, which weight 170
200 g, the diluted extract was used (1:100). After giving this
diluted extract (20 60 mcl / for the weight of 100g) to the animals,
it was established that the secretion of gastric juice increased
gradually to 10 ml. The secretion does not increase when giving
bigger dosage of preparation (see 1
picture). The observation of the salt acid secretion
showed that the largest amount of it was obtained when the diluted
extract draught was 40 mcl / for the weight of 100 g (see
2 picture). The secretion of pepsin is largest when 60
mcl / 100 g (see 3 picture) draught is
used. Observing an activity of lipazion (see
4 picture) and proteazion (see
5 picture), it was estabished that the largest activity
of those ferments is when 60 mcl / 100 g draught is used. In this
case the activity suddenly rises until after 6 hours it reaches
the maximum point; later on it gradually decreases until it reaches
the previous point
|
|
DETERMINATION OF LD50 AND HYPERSENSIVITY (ALLERGY)
EFFECT
18 22 g of white mouse was investigated. Some
extract was injected into the cavity of stomach and some was poured
through probe into the stomach of the mouse. The facts were compared
with the influence of 40 % etanol used in this case as ekstrahen.
The experiment shown that LD50 of the extract is 1.103
ml (55.15 ml/ for kg of weight), that is, 0.034 ml (1.7 ml/ for
kg of weight) bigger then LD50 of observed 40 % etanol,
which is 1.069 ml (53.45 ml/ for kg of weight). The conclusion was
drawn that the herbs of the extract do not increase the toxicity
in comparison with the 40 % etanol.
As to hypersensivity (allergy) caused by the extract,
the investigation on an active and passive anaphilacsation and the
local hypersensivity were carried out. 250 300 mumps and 2500
3000 rabbits took part in the investigation. In order to have
a larger number of allergens a half of LD50, that is,
0.22 ml of the extract was used, which was diluted with physiological
solution (1 : 4), in order not to have side effect caused by etanol.
During the investigation nor active or passive anaphilacsation neither
anaphilacsation shock was observed. The conclusion was made that
in the place where the preparation was injured an allergic inflammation
was not found.
|
|
DETERMINATION OF LOCAL EFFECT FOR SKIN AND MUCOUS MEMBRANE
There were investigated 2500 3000 rabbits and
300 mumps. Not diluted extract, diluted extract (1: 1) and for
control 40 % etanol were used for samples. Observing the effect
of samples for skin and mucous membrane, histological changes were
certified depending on the time of their appearance and heaviness
of injury. The changes of epiderm, derm, hypoderm and epitel of
mucous membrane, mucous membrane and under mucous membrane lamella
were evaluated to a certain degree. The data of experiment shown,
that the local effect for the skin and mucous membrane depends on
the effect of local etanol. The least effect was using diluted extract
ratio (1: 1). Using extract some histological changes, in comparison
with the effect of 40 % etanol, appear later, thats why they decrease
the effect of the active substance of etanol extracted from the
herbs for the skin and mucous membrane
|
|
DETERMINATION OF EFFECT FOR ALIGMENTARY CANAL (TRACT)
The patients of 41 82 age were investigated.
The endoscopic investigation of gullet, stomach and duodenum were
done for 83.3 % of them, the radiologistic investigation of stomach
for 5.5 % of them. During the investigation it was diagnosed atrophy
gastrit for 55.5 % of patients and superficial gastrit for 33.3
% of patient. The complains of patients were following: the feeling
of fullness in the area of stomach (83.3 %), a stomachache (72.2
%), bad appetite (72.2 %), sicken (44.4 %), a whiff of stomach (27.7
%), constipation (27.7 %), vomiting (16.6 %), heartburn gnaw (11.1
%), throw up (5.5 %), diarrhoea (5.5 %). All patients had taken
30 drops of (1.5 ml) of the extract tree times a day 15 20 min
before the meal. Two weeks later all indisposition of 66.6 % of
patients disappeared and 33.4 % of patients decreased. After the
investigation the rest of complains were a stomachache (11.1 %),
sicken (11.1 %), a whiff of stomach (5.5 %), a constipation (5.5
%). During the treatment other different kind of effects were observed
as well: mood improvement for 33.3 % of patients, sleepiness appearance
for 16 % of patients, calming effect for 11.1 % of patients, improvement
of sleep and disappearance of head swimming for 5.5 % of patients.
|
|
Making generalizations about investigation it was concluded that
herbs used in making the extract (that is, the same preparation)
improve digestion.
|
|